Shame on Chicago

Congratulations Chicago, city of my birth, for once again leading the country in embarrassing revolts. Aren’t you proud of yourself as a great city. A city that prides itself on being Democrat, and of being complete jerks. Your population cannot intelligently debate or argue issues, so they immediately incorporate Rules for Radicals approaches to solving problems. How naive you are to allow yourself to be goaded into violence by a man who allied himself with Nazis during WWII to send his fellow Jews to the gas chambers. Chicago, ruled by an associate of the dictator himself, has proudly allied itself with the communist creed.

I’m all for Socialism provided the leaders include themselves in the misery. I will become socialist on the same day when all from the top man down have the same privileges as the common man. If that is not clear let me state it another way. When Barack Obama and his entire cabinet, and all the bureaucracies, and agencies, the Congress, the Senate, and the Supreme Court all receive the exact same remuneration and rights. No Beast, no Air Force One, no White House, no private or Swiss bank accounts, no body guards, nothing, just the exact same pay and housing we the people get, and you live in the same small apartment you give me. The same holds for all entertainers, bankers, CEOs. All of them will do what they love for the exact same pay. There will be no mansions, no limousines, no private planes or first class flights. They will be the same.

If you can make that work Chicago, then I will play your game. In the meantime, I will remain a conservative capitalist who clings to my religion and guns while you continue to roll downhill into the Utopian abyss of equal outcomes for all.


Guess who this is?



Challenge This, I Doubt You Can

For your viewing pleasure I urge you to watch this video by Bill Whittle and challenge the message if you can. I doubt you will be able to argue the veracity.

If You Want To Be A Radical, Hang With Radicals

My Flag Flies Everyday

My Flag Flies Everyday

A few months before the election, I wrote a piece called Fidel All Over Again? In this post, I explained my fears that BO was a radical and leaned toward communism. At the time, I wasn’t really sure, now I am certain that he is both a radical and a communist.  During the third debate of the campaign, John McCain attacked Obama on his associations with Bill Ayres and Acorn. Obama countered with an argument about how he will surround himself with competent people who will advise him on how to run the country.

“Let me tell you who I associate with. On economic policy, I associate with Warren Buffett and former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker. If I’m interested in figuring out my foreign policy, I associate myself with my running mate, Joe Biden or with Dick Lugar, the Republican ranking member on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, or General Jim Jones, the former supreme allied commander of NATO.

Those are the people, Democrats and Republicans, who have shaped my ideas and who will be surrounding me in the White House. And I think the fact that this has become such an important part of your campaign, Senator McCain, says more about your campaign than it says about me.”

Obama has now exposed his radicalism with the appointment of  unconstitutional advisors referred to as Czars. How many does he employ? Thirty two. At least two of them are self proclaimed communists or socialists. Ten of the czars report directly to Obama. A man who believes he is a leader should know that ten, plus a full cabinet is too large a number of direct reports. How can he possibly concentrate on anything with so many inputs? He won’t be able to. Either he will neglect some of the report to’s or he will become mired in information overload. Can he really make decisions on all the issues they will bring to the table  in so short a time?  Is there enough time in a week to meet and discuss policy with all of the czars, do the same with the cabinet,  give press conferences, take world sightseeing trips with the daughters, date nights with Michelle, and walk the dog too?

Diversity czar Van Jones, a self proclaimed communist, has spent several years advocating  revolution.  The Science czar, John Holdren holds unusual ideas about sterilization as a population control to limit climate polution.  He calls climate change skeptics  “dangerous members of a denier fringe.” I guess I can add that to my list of titles granted by name calling  liberals. The Diversity czar, Mark Lloyd, a proclaimed anti-capitalist, speaks favorably about the incredible Venezuelan revolution. Carol Browner, the Energy and Environmental czar, has been a member of known socialist groups. There are only twenty-eight others to check out. I will continue to do so.

I wish I could feel better by saying “I told you so,” but it doesn’t. All confirmation did is scare the hell out me. The direction POTUS is leading our country will never be “change I can believe in.”

Vetting Becomes “Smear”

It’s about time. Sarah Palin’s comment linking BO to terrorist Bill Ayres is suddenly being called a “smear campaign” against BO. For the past six weeks all I have heard, and read about in the news are personal attacks on Sarah Palin. The media explains to me, with my simple mind, that it is necessarty to “vet” a candidate that we know so little about. Maybe so. If this is true, then why are they now calling Sarah’s vetting of BO’s affiliation with America’s Premier Terrorist a smear.

I call this BIAS on the part of the media. A few years ago, Bernard Goldberg, a network reporter for CBS wrote a book called “BIAS.” They quietly removed him from their ranks. Why is this significant? Because the networks think that what they say is infallible. I didn’t realize the Catholic Church conferred this power upon them. Let’s call a spade a spade and admit that the media has been kissing BO’s ass for too many months. It is time to let the people of our country know the real side of BO, and his socialist background. If after we hear the story truthfully, and not from the DNC censor, we still elect him, then it is our fault for believing his crap.


Just who is Barack Obama? I know he has written a book that tells all about his life, but who is he? His book is only one perspective. Really, who is he? Why haven’t I heard CNN reporters prying into his life? Why haven’t they interviewed his classmates, his church congregation, his minister, his family? I’d like to know from the people who spent time with him about the type of character he really is. In one short month, I know more about Sarah Palin than I need to know. After twenty months, I still haven’t got a clue as to who BO is.

BO’s campaign has released everything I have heard about him. Or BO will allude to his book. He portends a blase, “want to know about me?” “Read my book.” BO pretends to know a lot about the modern media and the internet, yet, when it comes to finding out about his really true character, he defers to his book. What is he hiding? If he truly wanted to be elected for honorable reasons, his life would be an open book. The media should examine, and reveal every moment of his life to us. Why do I have to read his book to get the man’s background and true character? This is the age of You-Tube, My Space, BLOGS, and CNN. Let us hear it from the so called unbiased media reporters.

Let’s get the facts about his association with Tony Resko. What are the true details of the real estate deal made on his house? I have heard BO tell the story, but I want the dirt from the media diggers. Just what was his association with Bill Ayres? I haven’t heard any interviews with Ayres explaining the relationship and the work they did?

Why hasn’t BO been placed before Charles Gibson, to answer a set of extemporaneous original questions? I’d like to see Charley, acting like God before BO demanding to know the answers, just as he did with Sarah. If there ever was a sexist interview that was one.

I want to hear from his congregation too. Sure, he has resigned from the church, but does that mean he defaults to his Muslim background? Did he resign from his faith? One does not give up a belief system that easily, i.e., if one truly believes. How do his fellow parishioners hold him? Did he really attend regularly?

How did the man get educated? Who foot the bill for his “private” education? What is the name of the school? What did his teachers think of him? What were his grades? What courses did he study? How about his student loans, I’m sure he had some. How did he pay them off? Did he pay them off?

How about his lovely wife, Michelle, what is her background? I haven’t seen any prying reporter digging into her life either.

Perhaps, if all this digging and reporting on the private life of BO turned up to be unnewsworthy, he would convince me that he is the right man for the job. The bottom line, is this, “I don’t trust BO or his campaign. He is not the right man for the job, and never will be.”