Destroy It Before It Comes to Get You

My Flag Cries EverydayEver since I attended the Joliet and Morris, Illinois Tea Parties, I have witnessed the events being  attacked by left wing liberals. All of the attacks are vitriolic in nature. It is my observation that whenever the liberal left goes after something it is because they are deathly afraid of it. They have to destroy it before it comes to get them. 

Here are some examples of how the left has been attacking its opposition.

 1. Sarah Palin, she energized the Republican party. Overnight, the right wingers  had a champion from nowhere. The Left saw the threat and sent an army of investigators to Alaska to find any dirt they could on the lady. They were afraid their man would lose to an honest to goodness conservative.

2. Joe The Plumber Wurtzelbacher.  BO confronted Joe on the street in front of Joe’s house, and asked if Joe had any questions. Joe asked a single legitimate question, which unmasked BO. In the the following 48 hours we knew more about Joe The Plumber than we know about Obama to this day. The Democrats went so far as to violate his privacy by  digging into records that were not public. Why was it so important for them to destroy Joe? He was a threat to getting the One into office.

3. TEA PARTY DAY, April 15, 2009 a grass roots protest organized by simple people who are frustrated with the way BO is spending like a drunken sailor, and the entire government is steam rolling all of his requests through without any arguments. The protesters also voiced a strong belief in the US Constitution, which they believe Obama wants to trash.  So what does the liberal left do? They begin a barrage of media comments about the inefficacy of the event. Nancy Pelosi goes on TV to announce it was organized by big money. So what if it was, isn’t it fair when the conservative right uses big money to get its message out?  Well there wasn’t any big money behind the event, it was just plain folks who are pissed. Another jerk by the name of Anderson Cooper comes out the next day and makes a comment that it’s pretty hard to protest when you are tea bagging. He said it with such vehemence that I looked up the meaning ot tea bagging.  Only a perverted liberal would know the meaning, and enjoy the decadence of it. A buddy of Anderson, Keith Olbermann also made a snide reference to ‘tea bagging’. Then came the CNN reporter who interviewed a man at the Chicago Tea Party. He held a toddler in his arms. The reporter asked him why he was there. The guy started spewing his frustration when the reporter turned away and made a comment that this was obviously an attempt by Fox News to incite a riot. Next, was the not-so funny comedienne Jeanine Garafalo who accused the tea baggers of being racist. If watching my country get raped and speaking out against it makes me a racist, so be it.

4. Rush Limbaugh, The Liberals have been trying to destroy this man for fifteen years. They are pushing like hell to enact a new Fairness Doctrine to silence talk radio. Why? They can’t stand the idea that any conservative would stand up to a liberal and oppose his stupid ideas.

5. Sean Hannity, another conservative who regularly speaks the truth about the evil of liberalism. He is constantly being referred to by POTUS as someone who doesn’t like him.

6. Today, I watched a video interview with James Carville, Liberal Democrat extraordinaire on the View. He referred to the Tea Baggers as  a Bunch of Hateful Old People.

Why are the liberals so revengeful when they promote themselves as the “minds” of the world? They are revengeful because their brains are inculcated with beliefs that a person should not have liberty. They believe people should be cared for and controlled by the government, and by dictators.  Wake up America, these are the ideas of feudalism, and monarchies. The great liberal thinkers believe we should belong to someone. Talk about a tired old idea.

Thieving Radical Hate Monger?

A few years ago I took a course in improving human performance. In that course, the instructor advised that if I wanted to become a leader, that I should hang out with leaders. The principle is a small step toward getting what you want. I would learn valuable lessons in leadership from the associations. I thought about this principle while watching the news last night. One of BO’s spinmasters was accusing Sean Hannity of trying to make BO guilty by association.  It occurred to me that the liberal candidate for president is hanging with some interesting people. First he is using several thieving ex-CEO’s from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to advise him on matters related to the housing crisis. Next, he hangs with a “guy from his neighborhood,” who is a proclaimed non-repentant terrorist. The man clearly hates our country. Let’s not forget his time with Anton Resko, known to seek out corrupt politicians for personal gain. BO has some nefarious real estate dealings with this man. On Sundays, he is known to hang with his good friend Reverend Jeremiah Wright who preaches Black Liberation Theology (translation, hate whitey and the government with all your heart and soul).

WIthin this group of associations there is a thread of continuity; thievery, radicalism, hatred.  BO wants me to believe that his associations with these people have not influenced him in any way. Just where is BO going with all this? Perhaps he wants to be the thieving radical hate monger of the century.

There a few more asscociations that occurred earlier in his life. Like the one with his mother, a known radical thinker, his grandparents, also known to be radical thinkers. Then there is Barack Hussein Obama Senior. BO would like us to think his father abandoned him, but BO-Sr. kept in touch with his son, and BO- Sr. believed in taxing the rich to benefit the poor, or “redistribution of wealth.”

I don’t believe for a moment that the association with his parents didn’t have any influence on his life or his values.

What is scary about his associations, is that the people who are backing him must  be thinking the same way. Why else would they worship him?