On the day of the shooting at Sandy Hook elementary school, I distinctly remember a report stating that all the guns found inside the school were pistols and that an AK type rifle was found in the shooter’s car. Below, I have included a news clip to support my recollection.
Recently, I listened to the president’s speech from Colorado where he specifically states that the shooter used a fully automatic weapon. Here is an excerpt from the transcript of Obama’s speech given on April 3, 2013 in Colorado
Here is the quote from the White House transcript of the event.
“Now, over the next couple of months, we’ve got a couple of issues: gun control. (Applause.) I just came from Denver, where the issue of gun violence is something that has haunted families for way too long, and it is possible for us to create common-sense gun safety measures that respect the traditions of gun ownership in this country and hunters and sportsmen, but also make sure that we don’t have another 20 children in a classroom gunned down by a semiautomatic weapon – by a fully automatic weapon in that case, sadly.”
Correct me if I am wrong, but didn’t the president say the shooter used a fully automatic weapon?
Who is right or better yet who is lying? My guess is that Obama lied in his speech to convince us we need another one of his Constitution bashing laws passed. What sense does it make to ban assault weapons when the school shooters have used pistols? What sense does it make to ban weapons from law-abiding citizens when gang shooters use pistols purchased on the street? What sense does it make to require extensive background checks when criminals buy guns from criminals?
I am really confused folks. Does the government want to protect us by passing laws against us, at the same time it ignores laws. For instance, why do we have laws against campaigning in front of polling places if we allow thugs to stand beating a baton into their palms while we try to enter the polling place ? What sense does it make to have laws to control immigration when we totally ignore them for specific people? What sense does it make to have laws to secure the border when we open it up and let people march into our country without question? What sense does it make to create Department of Homeland Security and then load it up with weapons and ammunition that cannot be used to protect our borders, and to keep people from crossing illegally? What sense is it to sue states that try to uphold the laws the federal government ignores?
Where is all this confusion leading?
Related articles
- Does Obama actually know what an automatic weapon is? (girlsgoneguns.wordpress.com)
- The Liar In Chief Gets Bolder And Bolder … Now Lanza Used A Machine Gun (youviewed.com)
- Sandy Hook Shooter Used a Fully Automatic Weapon, Says Obama (americanlivewire.com)
- Shameless Liar Obama Says Newtown Killer Used “Fully Automatic Weapon” (thegatewaypundit.com)
- President Obama Claims Sandy Hook Shooter Adam Lanza Used ‘Fully Automatic Weapon’ (guns.com)
Filed under: Government | Tagged: Automatic firearm, Barack Obama, Colorado, constitution, Denver, Gun Control, Illegal Immigration, Obama, Sandy Hook, White House | 1 Comment »
