Assimilation

Many of us speak of the assimilation of new immigrants into our society, but what is assimilation? It is simple. Assimilation is the absorption and integration of people, ideas, or culture into a wider society or culture. When thousands of people enter a country from a foreign land, it takes considerable time for them to understand our culture. We have gone through this process several times in the history of the USA. Each time, it was difficult for us, but more so for the newcomer. It is they who have to learn a new language and new customs. We on the other hand have to tolerate the migrants old ways as they slowly evolve into the American way. During my lifetime I have witnessed several waves of immigrants entering our society. First was the wave that bought my parents here in the nineteen twenties and long before I was born in the nineteen thirties. I grew up in a neighborhood populated by Americans, Hungarians, Italians, Ukranians, and Polish. I’m certain I left some of them out, but time has a way with dealing with memories.

My father’s assimilation began when at age seventeen he joined the Illinois Central Railroad as a laborer. His sponsor was his sister’s husband, who had arrived a few years earlier than he did. Uncle John Yusko most likely helped him learn the language on the job. Also, many of his supervisors were the sons of immigrants who knew the language and could communicate in Hungarian when English failed. Gradually, my Dad began speaking in English, but never at home. He and Mom spoke in the familiar language of their birthplace. As children, my older brother taught me and our younger sister to talk English while he learned from the Nuns at school. Many of the local businesses were run by immigrants and they too learned from and taught their customers. The best assessment I can make is that assimilation takes time and patience. My dad had a fairly good command of the language even into his nineties, but reverted to Hungarian when he didn’t have the English word. It was hilarious when Mom and Dad while speaking Hungarian slid an English word into the sentence. In my mother’s case she reverted more to Hungarian as she aged.

The second wave of immigrants I encountered was after the 1956 Hungarian Revolution against the Russians. My mother paired me with the nephew of our Pastor’s housekeeper. He was about the same age as me and a genuine Molotov cocktail-throwing rebel who fled for his life. We were inseparable; he challenged me to speak Hungarian, and I urged him to speak English. We were inseparable for about a year, and then I left town to go to college. The next time I saw him, he was on leave from the army. He had joined up to assimilate faster. He sure did. He returned on leave speaking excellent English with a hefty Alabama accent. He went to school on the GI Bill and became an engineer. He assimilated.

The next round of migrants I became aware of came from Viet Nam. My cousins in California helped them through their difficulties for at least ten years. The hardest part of assimilation is getting employment. These poor people struggle with life and do their best to make a living. After that, I lost track of any other migrant infusions, but I have witnessed an awful lot of Central Americans cutting lawns in the neighborhood. I even convinced myself to hire one to do my lawn chores. It is the best decision I ever made to assist with assimilation.

This morning, I researched how the Israelis infused so many people into their country. They devised a process called the Kibbutz. As new immigrants arrived, they were assigned to a Kibbutz, which is nothing more than a farm with a formal name. The newcomers worked the land to raise vegetables and livestock for their consumption and the markets. Any profit made was distributed equally between members of the Kibbutz. That sounds a bit Marxist to me. Many of these enterprises have evolved from agriculture to manufacturing, depending on the individuals’ capabilities. I think this concept appeals to me and is one that we could propose here. Why not divide these people into manageable groups, assign them to some land and basic tools, and let them have at it? The problem with my idea is the government. We have so many swamp creatures inventing regulations and work rules that a Kibbutz in the Israeli sense would be unlawful.

Back when my parents arrived, there were no unions, children were allowed to work, OSHA wasn’t yet an idea, and workers could take chances on the job. It was a working economy. However, employers tended to overdo things. Working conditions became difficult, and the people felt like slaves. When our most revered president, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, became president and worked to ease people’s suffering by inventing new laws and regulations, he called it the New Deal, but inadvertently created the Swamp. The various Bureaus have been left unfettered to make rules that are as strong as laws, except they aren’t laws written by Congress and voted in. They are regulations that are imposed upon us whether we like them or not. Because these Bureaus are not controlled by ‘We the People’ they have gone on their merry way and have continued to dream up countless ways to make our lives better than we can. Since the nineteen forties they have grown and spent trillions of dollars on too many things that don’t really make our lives better, but they do make our lives more expensive.

The current government’s approach to assimilation involves two policies: The first is to fly or bus people by the hundreds to various parts of the country and let them loose. The second is to do nothing and allow the immigrant himself to find a way to live. The first is to spread the population without regard to the immigrants or the cities where they are dumped. Cities nationwide have seen this invasion and are remiss about handling housing, clothing, meals, and, more importantly, jobs. The result is that we see communities of tent cities popping up in urban areas all around the country.

When the country encouraged a large population of immigrants to come in the early twentieth century, it needed labor to do work. The current administration has no clue what these people will do when they arrive. Should I hire a gardener, a housemaid, and a cook and provide them a place to live while they work for me? I could be okay with hiring help, but I cannot afford that, a life with my family and Uncle Sam, too.

I’m afraid in the long run, I will end up paying these people to assimilate. Uncle Sam will finally wake up and realize he has created a human catastrophe. He will then begin implementing new social programs to assist immigrants. Two things will happen: 1. He will raise our taxes, and 2. He will print money to pay for the programs, thus increasing inflation and making life equally miserable for all of us. This flood of new immigrants smacks of the redistribution of wealth plan inaugurated by our Progressive, Liberal, Socialist, and Communist former President Obama. When does this guy go away?

Drone Theory

This country of ours is turning pussy. By now, I would have guessed a hundred drones would have been shot out of the sky. Instead, we wait patiently for someone related to Uncle to confess that they are a Russian attempt to keep Donald Trump from being inaugurated. Let me be the first to spread that rumor.

Actually, I have a theory about drones. It is so simple that it has to be true. Why no one has postulated this theory is hard to believe. What season is this? Christmas, of course. What happens at Christmas? We all run around buying presents for our loved ones. A few of us, like me, do all of our shopping online. This phenomenon has grown so big that most of my packages won’t arrive until after Christmas.

It is a known fact that one or more of the largest delivery companies has been experimenting with drone deliveries. Here is my theory: Amazon and Walmart are using the holidays to test mass package deliveries. The drones are concentrated in neighborhoods, fly from place to place at various altitudes, and disappear to go get another package. Like Santa Claus, they deliver packages all around the country. They already own drones and have spent enormous amounts of money to buy them in all sizes. That is my story, and I’m sticking to it.

Spend, Spend, Spend

Stop the insanity! How does our Congress rationalize authorizing a bill to fund the government by putting a 1500-page bill in front of a greedy Congress? It is not enough that the money required to keep the government running is insanely exorbitant. They want to load it up before the regime changes. That is a guarantee for more inflation early in 2025. It is just what we want as citizens: higher prices for everything.

Follow the link I have added to learn just which people are affected. https://federalnewsnetwork.com/government-shutdown/2024/12/what-happens-to-federal-pay-and-benefits-during-a-government-shutdown/#:~:text=Excepted%20employees%20continue%20to%20work%20but%20are%20not,and%20get%20paid%20as%20usual%20during%20a%20shutdown.

Many people will not be paid during the shutdown but will get paid back. In other words, they don’t lose anything. Many will take vacations or will retire. Over the years, Congress has passed numerous loopholes to keep from not being paid. So, what is the big flap about closing down? Nothing. It is all a political battle between parties. But a shutdown is worth whatever small sacrifice some people will be forced to make to improve the lot for all of us in the long term. This whole thing is a bluff by Biden’s shadow government designed to put tremendous burden on the incoming president. Democrats are officially declaring open warfare against Trump right from day one. If I had my wish come true, all democrats would be jailed for voting for a 1500 page bill, anytime, much less three weeks before a change.

The newly elected government has just two years to make change happen. We elected them for change. The USA is technically bankrupt with our existing debt and are now taking all tax income to pay the interest. There is but one way to fix the problem. We must stop spending, pay our bills, and live frugally on what we have. You and I are not allowed to print money to pay off our debts; We are forced to use what we get from our employers to pay our bills. I live in a state that is also bankrupt. Illinois continues to borrow money to pay for spending that occurred a long time ago. Most of it is the result of unfunded pension funds. With all the retirees drawing pensions the state has no money to pay for roads and bridges. Fortunately, for us we can still borrow, but we too, are living on borrowed time. Our legislature does not have the balls to do the right thing which is to reduce the man power employed to do the work.

I voted for fiscal responsibility, not for pork barrel spending of money we don’t have. Shut her down!

PSA-241108-Who Took Our Money Away?

WHO TOOK MY MONEY?

Actually, Democrat President Kennedy and Sergeant Shriver were the first ones to misuse the Social Security account.  They used Social Security funds to start the Peace Corps.   Not the first or last time our money has been taken from American citizens and given to foreign nations. Things every US citizen should know and remember about Social Security and changes made: A History Lesson on Your Social Security Card . . . Just in case some of you young whippersnappers (& some older ones) didn’t know this.   It’s easy to check out, if you don’t believe it   Be sure and show it to your family and friends.   They need a little history lesson on what’s what and it doesn’t matter whether you are Democrat or Republican . . .Facts are Facts

Social Security Cards up until the 1980s expressly stated the number and card were not to be used for identification purposes.   Since nearly everyone in the United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the message, NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION, was removed. Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program.He promised:

1.) That participation in the Program would be Completely voluntary.
No longer Voluntary

2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program.
Now 7.65% on the first $90,000.

3.) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year.
No longer tax deductible
4.) That the money the participants put into the independent ‘Trust Fund’ rather than into the general operating fund, and therefore, would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program.
Under Democrat President Johnson the money was moved to the General Fund and Spent.

5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income.
Under Democrats Clinton & Gore Up to 85% of your Social Security can be Taxed.

Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to ‘put away’ — you may be interested in the following:

Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent ‘Trust Fund’ and put it into the general fund so that Congress could spend it?
A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically controlled House and Senate. Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?
A: The Democrat Party. Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?
A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the ‘tie-breaking’ deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US

Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants?
A: That’s right!   Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party.   Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments!   The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it!

Then, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!

This Is Why Freedom Of Speech Is Vital