Have you ever hired a lawyer to represent you with the idea that you will lose? If you have you are not normal. We hire lawyers to win. We want to stay out of jail, we want to get the judgement in our favor, but we never hire him to lose. Yet, half of all people who hire lawyers lose, and the other half wins. Very seldom is there a compromise settlement. Settlements appear when a lawyer who is clearly losing his case argues for a compromise which in his mind is a win for you, as in ten years in jail versus life in prison.
Lawyers are trained to win. They learn to debate whether their client is on the wrong side or not. They argue in your behalf even when they know you are guilty as sin. Even though we know this we continue to hire lawyers to represent us in government. Hiring of course is our vote. We argue that lawyers know the law therefore they must be in charge of writing new ones and upholding the existing ones. We also know that there is always the conflict between good and evil, black and white, north vs south. From the very beginning our government has evolved into two factions based on political ideology, liberal, and conservative. Most of the people who wrote our constitution and the Declaration of Independence were trained in law.
In the beginning of our country, before we were a nation we were ruled by a single person called king. It was his way or the highway. Needless to say that many of the people who lived in North America at the time of our revolution still pledged allegiance to the king and probably continued that allegiance after the separation from England.
I am not knowledgeable in history well enough to say for certain that some of our new members of congress may have still carried some allegiance to the king. For the sake of argument I venture to guess that some did. What these people did was to poison the congress with opposing ideas and attitudes. The result was an evolution towards the two ideologies which dominate out political system to this day. We have settled on two ideologies one liberal (Democrat) and one conservative (Republican). As I stated above they were trained in law, and in debate and in winning.
In the beginning there was more legitimate compromise between groups. Our system seemed to be working, but somewhere along the way (About early 1900) a new faction began introducing radical ideas. The faction was a split from the democrats and proposed ideas and laws that imposed far more conflict than the normal average democrats. They liked to call themselves progressives.
At about the same time that Woodrow Wilson was promoting progressivism in America Carl Marx was pushing communism in Europe. Marx had a student named Lenin, and these two were not content to allow their ideas to evolve slowly into the hearts and minds of the people. Instead they introduced them with revolution, convert or die. We in America had a hint of what was coming with the progressive movement, but we didn’t believe in introducing it aggressively with revolution. We were content to allow the communists in America to promote their foul ideas under their First Amendment rights to free speech. Gradually, these communist voices grew and infiltrated organizations throughout America. Most notably they overtook our institutions of learning. With young minds within their command they have been able to poison the minds of our youth with ideas of revolution and communism.
Most of these revolutionaries are democrat and they have begun spreading their leftist ideas into government. Combine the concept of electing lawyers as our Representatives and Senators along with their leftist mindset received from college we have a system that is causing internal conflict and rioting in the streets all in the name of destroying America.
Add into this mix a group of very, very rich people like George Soros, and liberal think tanks who fund hundreds of very democratic sounding organizations that are in the business of fomenting radical change. Black Lives Matter, and ANTIFA are two that come to mind. These groups are basically communist in their ideology, but have been named to sound like something else. For instance Black Lives Matter does not do anything to effect change in the black neighborhoods where hundreds of black people are being shot and killed weekly by other black people. Why do they instead concentrate on blacks who have been killed by white police? Because it makes for better TV and that spreads the message of their revolution faster and further than saving black lives in the black community.
The newest movement is the one to defund police departments. This one is so crazy radical that it is hard to believe these people have brains. Yet, there is at least one city where they have begun to dismantle the police department to make them into something more “touchy-feely and please don’t steal, riot, or kill people it is not nice” kind of force. While the criminal will continue to use weapons without flinching, cause blood to flow, and the new cops will have to hold the perp by the hand until a highly paid psychologist arrives on the scene to talk the criminal down.
In conclusion, all I want to point out is that the reason we have all of these problems in America today is because we elect too many lawyers into office. They don’t know how to lose or to compromise a real solution that makes both sides happy. They are trained to WIN not to SOLVE problems.
Filed under: Conservative, Education, Election, Government, politics | Tagged: Antifa, BLM, Communism, Lawyers |
Leave a Reply