Concentration of Control

Imagine living in the state of Illinois which is a solid democrat state. It has been for many years. Look at the map below and see where the liberal concentration is located, it is the solid blue area near lake Michigan. That concentration of people is Chicago and its collar counties. There are 12.88 million people in Illinois, and 9.73 million live in that dark blue area. The situation is similar for all the other major population areas in the country.

ATT00001.jpg

A smart campaigner would save money by asking for votes in those concentrated areas seen on this map, that is, if the system allowed presidents to be chosen by popular votes. It would be totally unfair to all the people who live in less populated areas. Their votes would be meaningless, in fact, we could save a lot of money and trouble by not holding elections in states without a mass population of a particular party. The genius of our Constitutional fathers is highlighted by this element of our process. We pick the electors, they pick the president.

The number of electoral candidates is based on the number of Congressmen and Senators.  The number of  Congressmen each state has is based on population. Each state has two Senators.  To win the election one needs half of the 538 plus one. It is theoretically possible to get 270 electoral votes by winning the eleven states with the highest populations provided those states are all of the same party. The video below explains the process.

One Response

  1. I understand the concept and the reasoning behind it. However, in practice, the result in recent decades has been that most of the campaigning is done in a handful of swing states, essentially making the rest of the states voting to be discounted.

    I also believe that when it comes to policies affecting practical issues (not moral or value based issues) there is less of a divide between the interests of people in less populated areas and those in more urban areas than there used to be in our country historically.

    So I am willing to take a look at reforming or even eliminating the electoral college. However, I would not support that happening, for example, right now when an election has already taken place and the people pushing for reform are unhappy with the result of that election. It is clearly unfair to try to change the rules just because some people don’t like the outcome. So if those laws will be reformed, it should be done midterm, not during the heat of an election cycle.

    I do think it is perfectly reasonable to have a recount of votes in key states where the result was very close. I’m aware that Wisconsin will now have a recount.

Comments are closed.

Journeyman's Journal

This is a journal of the art of woodworking by hand

KetoJENic Vibe

Keto Junkie 🥓🥑🍳 Health and Wellness based, Easy Recipes, and Keto Product Reviews

Quotes Database

Your Site Of Influential Quotes!

The Lockdown Chef

A cooking survival guide for those who don't know how

myserenewords

Seeking Solace in the Horizon of Life & Beyond.

MRS. T’S CORNER

https://www.tangietwoods

Parties & Events

events, fun

ESL Ventures

Teach ESL and Travel the World

Survival Garden

How to make it

Heart Felt

This platform is for the people who likes to talk straight from the heart🤩

Suzette B's Blog

Inspiration and Spirituality **Award Free**

Bhutadarma

Nothing is impossible (at least that does not violate the laws of physics). When you can..violate the laws of physics!

I Know I Made You Smile

cartoons/humor/fiction/nonfiction

galesmind

Come take a journey through my mind

Nutsrok

The humor and humanity of storytelling.

Gamintraveler

Travel Couple and Digital Nomads on a World Travel

summershaffer

A topnotch WordPress.com site

blogsense-by-barb

at the Re-Birth of America!

The Honking Goose

something to honk about

THE WAKING GIANT

United States Second Amendment Pitbull

%d bloggers like this: