Actress or Leader?

In last night’s debate between Trump and Clinton I thought about how the two were reported to prepare. In Trump’s case he openly admitted that he did not rehearse because there was such a thing as over preparedness. He chose instead to read and to study issues. Hillary spent five days, or more in sessions where she answered attacks posed by a Trump roll player. To me that sounds the same as an actress delivering a memorized script before the director in a dress rehearsal situation.

Trump was clearly on the defensive during parts of the session, and his answers were short, but to the point. He didn’t spend endless minutes hearing himself pontificate as did Hillary. His responses were extemporaneous meaning he was thinking on his feet. I’d be willing to bet that Hillary’s responses were fed to her through an ear-mic; a director feeding her cues such as “#3” and she automatically begins argument number three. It was very apparent that Hillary’s answers were very well written to address issues she wanted to get out rather than to answer questions head on.


I faulted Trump for not pushing her e-mail crisis more aggressively. I had to leave the room for about five minutes so I missed a part of the debate and did not hear anything about Benghazi, nor do I know if it even came up. There was one segment which Trump clearly missed when Hillary responded to her role in initiating ISIS. Trump was making the point that Obama’s failure to leave a security force in Iraq enabled ISIS to fill the void. She answered that President Obama was not responsible for removing troops because that decision was made before his tenure, clearly a blame Bush deflection.

Donald Trump is not known for his debating ability, nor for eloquent speaking. Because of that I did not expect him to perform as well as Hillary. The problem is that we have been conditioned by years of hearing lawyers argue against each other. Lawyers are trained to debate and spend years practicing their techniques. Since most candidates are lawyers we are barraged by eloquent and fluid arguments. For instance, I rate Ted Cruz as one of the most eloquent debaters ever heard on the campaign. The point I’m trying to make is that eloquence does not necessarily mean you win the argument. In every trial there is one side that wins and one that loses, so much for eloquence.

Who do you think won the debate?

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Success Inspirers World

Land of opportunity where everyone is given an opportunity to grow

Attila Ovari

Loving Life and Inspiring Others

Remember The 14 Words

We Must Secure The Existence Of Our People And A Future For White Children

galesmind

Come take a journey through my mind

Nutsrok

The humor and humanity of storytelling.

Henry Game

The Next Testament

Reclaim Our Republic

Knowledge Is Power

Grumpa Joe's Place

My Flag Flies Everyday

Gamintraveler

Love, Travel Lifestyle and Destinations

summershaffer

A topnotch WordPress.com site

I Know I Made You Smile

cartoons/humor/fiction/nonfiction

blogsense-by-barb

at the Re-Birth of America!

The Honking Goose

something to honk about

The Dangers of Allah

Confused about Islam, Muslims, Taqiyya, Kitman, The Islamic State, and Sharia? I've spent 14 years studying these confused beings.  They are not at all what they want us to believe, especially those who are ruled by al Qaeda , ISIS and the Muslim Brotherhood as well as those who commit overt and covert Jihad while practicing Sharia tortures upon women

dancingczars.wordpress.com/

“ The limitation of riots, moral questions aside, is that they cannot win and their participants know it. Hence, rioting is not revolutionary but reactionary because it invites defeat. It involves an emotional catharsis, but it must be followed by a sense of futility. ” ~ Martin Luther King, Jr.

THE WAKING GIANT

United States Second Amendment Pitbull

Caustic Synergy

United and alone in the world

ELLIOT LAKE News

Road To Political INcorrect Constructs & Forbidden Knowledge -- Yours To Discover

tutorials4view

Watch free tutorials in Full HD (1080p) quality video tutorials, sorted by subjects, like: Photoshop, Gimp, Facebook, Torrents, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Viruses and malware removal ( like ask,com, vqo6, Babylon ) and more and more.. If you like our tutorials and guided, please SUBSCRIBE to out channel at: http://www.youtube.com/user/ShaiSoft - tutorials4view.

Aspiring Conservative

Conservative blog with articles about today's politics!

Conservative Kentucky

Reality From my Perspective

Creeping Sharia

Documenting the Islamization of America

Hearing Aid News

HEAR it HERE first! The latest on developments in hearing aids and the hearing industry.

Socialism is not the Answer

Limited Government Is

John SterVens' Tales

Thee Life, Thee Heart, Thee Tears

%d bloggers like this: